The standard NEC dispute resolution provision which provides for disputes to be decided firstly by adjudication and then by a specified tribunal have been under closescrutiny by the Scottish appeal court in the case of The Fraserburgh Harbour Commissioners v McLaughlin & Harvey Limited, [2021] CSIH 58.
The pursuer raised court proceedings for damages in respect of certain defects in the works for the primary purpose of interrupting prescription (i.e. time bar) prior to any adjudication proceedings being commenced. There was no dispute between the parties that the defender was entitled to insist on its contractual right to have the merits of the matter determined by adjudication, and then arbitration, rather than the courts. However, the parties were in dispute as to what should happen to the court proceedings in the meantime: should they be sisted (i.e. paused) or dismissed?
You can read Chris Mackay and Andrew Little’s blog to find out why the court concluded it would sist the current court action pending the outcome of an adjudication and arbitration determining the merits of the dispute.
Related News, Insights & Events
Building safety in Scotland: Legislation comes into force on 6 January 2025
The Act was introduced by the Scottish Government to reduce the risk to life from unsafe cladding on high-rise homes.
Letters of Intent in construction projects: Practical insights
Letters of intent (LOI) are widely used in the construction industry. Here we explore what LOIs are, their role in the industry and how they can be used effectively.
Burness Paull strengthens energy and infrastructure expertise with appointment of new partner
03/12/2024
Burness Paull has strengthened its offering for clients in the energy and infrastructure sectors with the appointment of Scott Duncan.
