In the case of Harpur Trust v Brazel (see our previous update here for case details), the Supreme Court has confirmed that part-year workers under permanent contracts are entitled to 5.6 weeks leave per year and their leave entitlement should not be pro-rated to that of a full-time worker (as argued by Harpur Trust). The pay for that leave should be calculated using s.224 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, meaning that it should be based on the average weekly remuneration in the period of 52 weeks, ending with the start of the leave period (minus any weeks that have not been worked). For such workers, holiday pay should not be calculated based on 12.07% of their annualised hours. Even though that may result in higher rates of holiday pay for certain part-year workers, the Supreme Court is satisfied that is the correct implementation of the Working Time Regulations 1998.

Employers who apply the 12.07% holiday pay calculation, especially employers who engage workers with atypical working patterns (like offshore workers), may need to review their holiday pay arrangements (if they haven’t done so already). Please get in touch if we can assist.

Written by

Related News, Insights & Events

Neonatal Care Leave And Pay To Be Introduced From April 2025

Neonatal Care Leave and Pay to be introduced from April 2025

Parents will now receive the right to neonatal care leave from ‘day one’ of their employment under new regulations.

Read more
E3 Essential Elements Of Employment

Webinar: Essential elements of employment training

03/02/2025


We are delighted to launch our next “Essential Elements of Employment” training series, bringing legal issues to life in virtual webinars that are practical and meaningful.

Read more
Proposed Amendments To The Employment Rights Bill Where We Are As We End The Year

Proposed amendments to the Employment Rights Bill: Our year-end wrap up

On 10 October 2024, the Employment Rights Bill 2024-25 (ERB) was introduced to Parliament. It had its second reading on 21 October 2024 and is currently at the Committee stage.

Read more

Want to hear more from us?

Subscribe here